<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>book review on Further Heitz</title>
    <link>/tags/book-review/</link>
    <description>Recent content in book review on Further Heitz</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Kelly Heitz</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="/tags/book-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Building Psychological Safety</title>
      <link>/post/psychological-safety/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/post/psychological-safety/</guid>
      <description>A few years ago, I read this article in the NYT What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team, by Charles Duhigg. A lot of it resonated with me, especially this finding:
 The researchers eventually concluded that what distinguished the
‘‘good’’ teams from the dysfunctional groups was how teammates treated
one another. The right norms, in other words, could raise a group’s
collective intelligence, whereas the wrong norms could hobble a team,</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>